Portland Web Innovators – Demolicious April 1, 2009

April 3, 2009 at 4:38 pm | Posted in Sofware Startup | 2 Comments
Tags: , , , , , ,

No it wasn’t an April fool joke.  The Portland Web Innovators really held their quarterly Demolicious meetup on April 1st.   It seemed that nearly 100 people gathered at gracious host Jive Software to see demonstrations of some of the latest projects here in Portland.

Kicking things off was Benjamin Stover & Jason Grlicky with I need to read this They sum up their application with a rather easy to remember phrase – bookmarks meet to do lists.  The problem they are solving revolves around the multitude of information that we read every day on the Internet.  Blog posts, articles, web pages – through out the course of the day we literally stumble upon too much material to read in the moment.  INTRT solves this problem by allowing you to single click a bookmarklet in your browsers bookmark toolbar.  That quick action will save a link to a post, article or information you found.  I just started using it and I find it very handy.

Next, I had the opportunity to present my current project MioWorks.com. The business problem that drove the development of MioWorks revolves around the challenges of synchronizing & collaborating with clients in the small business.  MioWorks is delivered as a SaaS application and provides a small business with several applications rolled into one.  The business gets an on-line contact manager or simplified CRM that centrally manages information and helps the team stay in sync.  On the other hand, MioWorks provides a customer portal where every contact in the CRM can now collaborate with the company in a one-on-one manner.  From asking questions to making requests and even downloading/uploading files.

Following me was Richard Fobes with Vote Fair Ranking The problem being solved by VoteFairRanking is related to surveys, polls and voting.  According to Richard, VoteFairRanking analyzes not just the top choice but the second, third fourth choices.  This allows VoteFairRanking to provide a better picture of not only the top preference but also second, third, fourth and so on.

Next up was Sam Grover who introduced Avatari, an application that allows you to quickly change your avatar on Friendfeed and Twitter.  Sam started the project as a way to learn how to write a Cocoa application.  Sam would like to extend the application to other services like Facebook but he must wait until they publish an API to allow his application to communicate with it.

Lastly Jason Glaspey gave us a demonstration of BlackTonic App.  The problem being solved by BlackTonic is the ability to remotely present to a client and control the pace of the presentation.  They are focusing their efforts on the vertical they know best – creatives and designers.   We have all used the cumbersome web presentation software in the market today and it looks like the BlackTonic team has found some secret sauce.  The presenter can control the presentation via the web and it doesn’t require any software download or installations for the remote users.  As a matter of fact the remote users can be on desktops, laptops or even iPhones.  All the remote screen change at the same time and screen size is automatically adjusted.  It’s a slick application.  The guys from Blacktonic have left the demo up for a few more days so you can see it.  Go quickly or it will be gone!

If you are interested in how to join Portland Web Innovators visit the web site or look for the next meeting on Upcoming.  You can also look for #PDXWI on Twitter.

Portland Web Innovators – Bootstrapping & Business Models

February 5, 2009 at 7:39 am | Posted in Software as a Service, Sofware Startup | 4 Comments
Tags: , , , , , , , , , ,

Dateline: Wednesday, February 4, 2009 – conference tables at Cubespace in Portland, Oregon for the Portland Web Innovators Meeting

The early evening meeting of the Portland Web Innovators group was attended by about thirty people with a mix of developers, designers and business folks.  The conversation centered around money.  Having it, not having it, making it and spending it.   Carolynn Duncan (@hundreddollar) lead a talk that took the group through the paces on bootstrapping a company.  Here is my rendition of her talk slightly condensed and sprinkled with colorful commentary from yours truly.

Carolynn began the conversation with a slide that says “Bootstrapping is good. Having a revenue model is better.” This set the tone for ensuing discussion.  Carolynn’s opening volley was to set the stage for what bootstrapping really is.  For many of us that are familiar with the “golden days” where VCs just through out cash to any idea, we have a warped perception of bootstrap.   Back in the day we would outline all of our wishes and wants to make sure we could pay salaries, get comfy offices and attend trade shows.  We would then double that amount and go look for funds in the amount of millions of dollars.   Carolynn reeled us in and helped us to think in terms of reality and today’s economy.  She defined bootstrapping a business as determining the bare minimum amount of cash needed to get a solution to a point where the revenue model out paced the expenses.  What a novel concept.  Spend as little as possible and make as much as you can.  Although this is inherent to our every day lives, for some reason the tech start up world forgot about this basic business tenant and it’s about time the tech community was told straight up to change their ways.

As Carolynn continued she explained that the equation for bootstrapping your idea was rather simple.  You need to determine the core ingredients necessary to get from point a to point b in your project.  For every item on your list you should determine if you must pay cash for that item or if you can get creative to minimize your expenses.  She offered suggestions of using less than perfect hardware for certain tasks, bartering or trading for needed services or leveraging external services where you can create a win/win situation without the exchange of cash.  She warned the audience of a failure of many companies; not exchanging value for value received.  She explained how even the most ambitious company has a limit to what they can endure when it comes to helping out your business.  Be cautious of what you are asking of your network and your suppliers and make sure that you know where to draw the line and cough up some of your hard earned money to keep the circle of life spinning.

Carolynn then displayed a simple ratio graph where she explained that a half ass product would require less than prudent sales tactics that would then result in a negative income stream which would eventually result in poverty and unhappyness.  On the flip side, she said that with some planning and an idea of what you are selling and knowing why they want to buy it (remind you of any previous blog posts?) then you can flip around the equation.  She demonstrated that a strategic product offering based upon a customer need could result in the pursuit of a working revenue model & customer acquistion strategy.  The end result of this type of planning and smart approach to development could lead to a much improved income stream resulting in the minimization of poverty in your household.    Simple concepts, yet another data point behind my continual harping in my blog that you should know your customer and determine what problem you solve BEFORE you write any code.

As Carolynn began to wind down the talk she posed one rather forward question.  The question was “Why build something if you don’t know how you are going to make money from it?”  You could hear the slight groans from the audience as our Portland based freedom fighters wrestled with this concept.  Now to be fair, there are times when people build things without the intention to ever make any money from it.  They are building things for the greater good and to enable them to contribute to the world at large.  But today’s talk was about money and making money, so in context of the meeting – her question was tremendously relevant and to the point. Carolynn also offered some great lists of what not to do when determining your business model.  Again the simple was supreme.  Don’t creat a new model.  Don’t be free.  Don’t seek double revenue models.  Don’t have special rates for friends and family. She also went on to discuss what does work and offeres 23 ways to think about revenue models. In her presentation she then gives us her insight on what she has seen work with 43 ways to get customers.  To see all of Carolynn’s tips and tricks you can visit her blog at www.bigpaperblog.com or follow Carolyn on twitter @hundreddollar

Thanks Carolyn for sharing you knowledge with the Portland Web Innovators and I hope that your advice will be put to good use by the brilliant minds in the audience who are almost all working on side projects or startups.  I loved your goal of seeing 10 new MILLION dollar businesses in Portland within in the next year.  I know for one I’ll be following your advice to make sure that MioWorks.com makes it into that short list.

Portland Web Innovators – Demolicious for January

January 8, 2009 at 5:55 pm | Posted in Software as a Service, Sofware Startup | 4 Comments
Tags: , , , ,

Last night I attended a meeting of the group Portland Web Innovators  called “Demolicious”.  Demolicious is a quarterly showcase of members work and ideas.  It was an interesting hour to watch 5 different presenters talk about new technologies that they are bringing to market.  The meeting was hosted at Nemo Design and with about fifty people in attendance the space was standing room only. 

It is great to see that the entrepreneurial spirit is alive and well in Portland.  I was very impressed with a few of the technologies that were shown.  One site called Sunago is a community management application for Mission type organization. It blends contact management with membership management focused around a specific vertical.   The author has decided to focus on Churches and other non-profits that serve communities of people.  Although each of these organizations is different, there are enough commonalities that can make a solution like his very successful.  It wasn’t clear what his intention was with this web application but I hope he figures a way to market it and support it so that he can have a great little business.   As you look through Sunago (which I suggest you do just for fun) keep in mind that this was built by one guy.  He said that he has been working on it in his spare time since April.  That’s not that long and the application has real value.  

Unlike several of the other applications we saw that wanted to be everything to everyone with no clear market, this one application has the best chance of building a business that can sustain.  My advice to Scott is to keep focused on the target you want to serve.  Don’t listen to the other techies that say you can expand to everyone and add more features.  Features are the death of today’s software when you just add them for the sake of adding them.   I also say…congrats Scott and I hope to see more about Sunago in the future. 

Another technology I liked was shown as part of the Mugasha web site. The overall concept of Mugasha is to allow users to seek out dance music played in “sets” by DJ’s around the world.  The concept is interesting but I would be very hesitant about the licensing ramifications of their implementation.  One of the founders commented that the music wasn’t copyright.  I think that he should go back and make sure this is the case.  Even if a DJ spins a new version of an Artists recording, that recording is owned by the original artist.  Just because the DJ mucked with it doesn’t make it new.  Even if the music is 85% new electronica the DJ programmed into his machines and uses 15% recognizable riffs….that’s copyright.  So a bit of advice for Mugasha…get an IP lawyer QUICK.  This is advice to everyone who is dealing with internet based music.  You are messing with the biggest legal system around copyright in the world.  If you don’t have all your answers before you launch, you could be in for some rather rough waters.  Read for yourself about a case in Australia where DJs were slammed for copyright. 

Ok enough about that…let’s talk about what is really cool about their technology.  They have figured out how to take a podcast and break it into chapters.  Users can then search on those chapters and find similar chapters in the library.  Rather ingenious.  I can see how this could be useful across the podcasting spectrum.  I myself hate having to listen to an hour long podcast just to get to the five minutes that I was interested in.  Imagine how this could be applied in today’s business culture.  If they could take this engine and allow you to search podcasts for specific types of segments – very cool.  

I hope that each of the presenters finds a way to turn their applications into a self sustaining business so that they can continue to innovate and share their ideas.

Blog at WordPress.com.
Entries and comments feeds.